<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Real Estate Rainmaker &#187; Mortgages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://RealEstateRainmaker.com/index.php/category/mortgages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://RealEstateRainmaker.com</link>
	<description>Take your lead generation by storm!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 21:24:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Living By Default</title>
		<link>http://RealEstateRainmaker.com/index.php/2011/12/15/living-by-default/</link>
		<comments>http://RealEstateRainmaker.com/index.php/2011/12/15/living-by-default/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 20:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Gooder Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing Bubble]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://RealEstateRainmaker.com/?p=4817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Dan Gooder Richard Just read a thought-provoking December 19, 2011 opinion piece in The New Yorker by James Surowieck that compares American Airlines “very smart” bankruptcy to underwater homeowners considering a “strategic default.&#8221; Read more at http://www.newyorker.com/talk/financial/2011/12/19/111219ta_talk_surowiecki Living By Default by James Surowieck “….The bursting of the housing bubble has left millions of homeowners [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Dan Gooder Richard</p>
<p>Just read a thought-provoking December 19, 2011 opinion piece in <em>The New Yorker</em> by James Surowieck that compares American Airlines “very smart” bankruptcy to underwater homeowners considering a “strategic default.&#8221;</p>
<p>Read more at <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/talk/financial/2011/12/19/111219ta_talk_surowiecki">http://www.newyorker.com/talk/financial/2011/12/19/111219ta_talk_surowiecki</a></p>
<blockquote>
<p>
<h2>Living By Default</h2>
<p></p>
<h3>by <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/bios/james_surowiecki/search?contributorName=james%20surowiecki">James Surowieck</a></h3>
</p>
<p>“….The bursting of the housing bubble has left millions of homeowners across the country owing more than their homes are worth. In some areas, well over half of mortgages are underwater, many so deeply that people owe forty or fifty per cent more than the value of their homes. In other words, a good percentage of Americans are in much the same position as American Airlines: they can still pay their debts, but doing so is like setting a pile of money on fire every month….It’s also possible that a wave of strategic defaults—a De-Occupy Your House movement—would get banks to take mortgage modification more seriously, which would be all for the better. The truth is that banks have been relying on homeowners to do the right thing. It might be time for homeowners to do the smart thing instead.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>
<div class="printfriendly alignright"><a href="http://RealEstateRainmaker.com/index.php/2011/12/15/living-by-default/?pfstyle=wp" rel="nofollow" ><img src="//cdn.printfriendly.com/button-print-gry20.png" alt="Print Friendly" /></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://RealEstateRainmaker.com/index.php/2011/12/15/living-by-default/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tweaks to the First Time Home Buyer $8,000 Tax Credit</title>
		<link>http://RealEstateRainmaker.com/index.php/2009/05/30/tweaks-to-the-first-time-home-buyer-8000-tax-credit/</link>
		<comments>http://RealEstateRainmaker.com/index.php/2009/05/30/tweaks-to-the-first-time-home-buyer-8000-tax-credit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 11:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amy Hausman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financing/Mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First-Time Buyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Buyer Leads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FHA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first time home buyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HUD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax credit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://RealEstateRainmaker.com/?p=1104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday the U. S. Department of Housing (HUD) issued a press release clarifying the status of the up to $8,000 federal tax credit in use with Federal Housing Administration (FHA) loans. Here are some of the new guidelines for homeowners using the $8,000 tax credit: State Housing Finance Agencies and certain non-profits can &#34;monetize&#34; the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- [endif]--></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial;">Yesterday the <a href="http://www.hud.gov/news/release.cfm?content=pr09-072.cfm" target="_blank">U. S.<span> </span> Department of Housing (HUD) issued a press release </a> clarifying the status of the up to $8,000 federal tax credit in use with Federal Housing Administration (FHA) loans. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial;">Here are some of the new guidelines for homeowners using the $8,000 tax credit:</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial;"> </span></p>
<ul style="margin-top: 0in;" type="disc">
<li class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial;">State Housing Finance Agencies and certain      non-profits can &quot;monetize&quot; the tax credit up to the full amount      of the tax credit (depending on the amount of the mortgage) to allow      borrowers to immediately </span> <span style="font-family: Arial;">(rather than waiting for their federal tax      refund check) </span> <span style="font-family: Arial;">apply the funds toward their down payments. </span> </li>
</ul>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial;"> </span></p>
<ul style="margin-top: 0in;" type="disc">
<li class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial;">Buyers financing through these state and      non-profit organizations will be able to use the tax credit for their down      payments via a short-term loan provided by the HFA or non-profit. In      addition to the borrower&#8217;s own cash investment, FHA allows parents,      employers and other governmental entities to contribute towards the down payment.<span> </span> (Remember that individuals can gift up      to $13,000 per person per year tax-free.)</span> </li>
</ul>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial;"> </span></p>
<ul style="margin-top: 0in;" type="disc">
<li class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial;">Home buyers using FHA-approved lenders can apply      the tax credit to their down payment in <strong>excess</strong> of 3.5% of appraised value or their closing costs,      which can help buyers achieve a lower interest rate.<span> </span> Buyers cannot use the tax credit amount      as part of their 3.5% down payment, but can use any or all of the funds as      additional down payment.</span> </li>
</ul>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial;">In light of these changes, what does this mean for the first-time buyers you are working with?<span> </span> The news is brand new – have you told them yet through your many marketing methods? </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial;">In addition, the <a href="http://www.nahb.org" target="_blank">National Association of Home Builders</a> predicts that the tax credit will fuel 160,000 home sales in the U. S.<span> </span> What portion of the 160K homes that are sold by November 30 will you have a part in?</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial;">Remember the date: the first time home buyer tax credit applies to purchases closed/settled on or before November 30, 2009.<span> </span> Don’t lose the opportunity to inform your buyers and get their business before time runs out for this federal tax credit.<span> </span> <span> </span> </span></p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<div class="printfriendly alignright"><a href="http://RealEstateRainmaker.com/index.php/2009/05/30/tweaks-to-the-first-time-home-buyer-8000-tax-credit/?pfstyle=wp" rel="nofollow" ><img src="//cdn.printfriendly.com/button-print-gry20.png" alt="Print Friendly" /></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://RealEstateRainmaker.com/index.php/2009/05/30/tweaks-to-the-first-time-home-buyer-8000-tax-credit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pros and Cons of Using Your Same Lender to Refinance</title>
		<link>http://RealEstateRainmaker.com/index.php/2009/05/25/pros-and-cons-of-using-your-same-lender-to-refinance/</link>
		<comments>http://RealEstateRainmaker.com/index.php/2009/05/25/pros-and-cons-of-using-your-same-lender-to-refinance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 10:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Gooder Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Refinancing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://RealEstateRainmaker.com/?p=1058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My wife, Synnove, and I are refinancing once again to get a lower rate. The new loan is a 30-year fixed at 4.625% with 1 point. Plus we are paying down the mortgage to get the lower rate that comes with a conforming loan and lock-in the lowest possible payment. After shopping rates and fees [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal">My wife, Synnove, and I are refinancing once again to get a lower rate.<span> </span> The new loan is a 30-year fixed at 4.625% with 1 point.<span> </span> Plus we are paying down the mortgage to get the lower rate that comes with a conforming loan and lock-in the lowest possible payment.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">After shopping rates and fees with three lenders, we made a Good Faith Estimate chart of fees (all the rates were identical) to guide our decision.<span> </span> Doing that comparison we learned two things about the costs of refinancing with the same lender who holds your mortgage now.  One pro, one con.</p>
<ol type="1">
<li class="MsoNormal"><strong><span>Pro:</span> </strong> Because our current loan was taken out after 2005      (in fact in 2007), we do NOT have to pay county/city/state transfer taxes      (stamps) if we refinance with the same lender.  This saves us about      $1400 at closing.  (Thus we went with our current lender, whose fees      were slightly higher than other lenders but the transfer tax savings      tipped the decision to our current lender.)</li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><strong><span>Con:</span> </strong> Now that we are refinancing with the same lender,      however, we CANNOT deduct the outstanding points from the first loan this      year (with a different lender we would get the tax break of deducting as      interest the non-amortized points from the previous refinance).       Instead, the refinance points this time are added to the outstanding      points charged on the first refinancing and the combined total is deducted      over the life of the 30-year loan.  Thus, we miss out on the tax      deduction in 2009 on the outstanding points from the first loan ($4,900 x      33% = $1,617) because we used our current lender.</li>
</ol>
<p class="MsoNormal">In the end, the pros and the cons wash each other out.<span> </span> Yet, after all the refi’s we’ve done over the years (this is our eighth) there is always something new to be learned about the process.</p>
<div class="printfriendly alignright"><a href="http://RealEstateRainmaker.com/index.php/2009/05/25/pros-and-cons-of-using-your-same-lender-to-refinance/?pfstyle=wp" rel="nofollow" ><img src="//cdn.printfriendly.com/button-print-gry20.png" alt="Print Friendly" /></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://RealEstateRainmaker.com/index.php/2009/05/25/pros-and-cons-of-using-your-same-lender-to-refinance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

